Name: Neighborhood Type
Display Field: tract
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>The research goal of this project was to explore heterogeneity in how much Californians will change the amount that they drive in response to changes in land use and transport system characteristics. We explore heterogeneity across two important dimensions – neighborhood type and trip type – and use statistical analysis of travel survey and land use data to quantify these relationships. We control for key household and individual demographic characteristics and characteristics of the surveys themselves. We also control for household selection of residential neighborhood type. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN>This project used data from numerous sources and required the use of multiple statistical methods to estimate the effect of land use and transport system variables on VMT, differentiated by local context. To create the dataset, we merged observations from five household travel surveys conducted in California between 2000 and 2009, calculated the distance for each trip taken in a vehicle, and added variables to represent the built environment in the census tract where each household lived. These variables were derived from census data as well as calculated using GIS and MapQuest’s Application Programming Interface (API). </SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN>Our final household estimation sample included complete observations for 52,975 weekday travel diaries from 45,624 households, some of which reported their travel on two days. This sample is much larger than any that we are aware of in the related existing literature. Our large sample is important because it allows us to obtain robust estimates of the effects we are interested in for each of seven distinct neighborhood types. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN>Our main analysis consisted of three steps. First, we used quantitative methods to classify census tracts into seven neighborhood types. Second, we estimated a multinomial logit model (MNL) of household choice of which neighborhood type to live in. Finally, we estimated tobit models of household weekday VMT, commute VMT for adult workers, and nonwork VMT for all adults for each neighborhood type. The tobit analyses are linked to the MNL model of neighborhood type choice as a means to control for residential self-selection. Tobit models are similar to linear regression analysis techniques, but more appropriately account for the significant percentage of zero VMT observations in our data. These models are the basis for calculation of the marginal effects and elasticities that are the main results of this project. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN>Results </SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN>The contribution of this work is to estimate both average VMT and the effects of land use and transport system characteristics on VMT for different types of neighborhoods and for different types of trips. At the most basic level, we find that there are surprisingly large differences in average VMT across neighborhood types: the highest-VMT neighborhood type has three times the average VMT as the lowest. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN>We also find that the effects of some land use and transport system characteristics do depend on neighborhood type, in ways that are intuitive but had not previously been empirically verified. For instance, the effect of a change in gasoline price on VMT is effectively zero in both “Central City” and “Rural” neighborhoods. This likely reflects the fact that residents who drive in these neighborhoods do not have flexibility to choose to drive less when gas prices are high – they are already minimizing the amount that they drive. In all other neighborhood types, the VMT effect of pricing is uniformly large and statistically significant. The effect on VMT of improving job access is highly variable across neighborhood types, with the largest absolute effect of local jobs seen in the “Rural” and “Suburb, Single Family Homes” neighborhood types. As would be expected, changing road density is an important determinant of VMT only in neighborhoods with relatively lower road densities. Understanding the differences in effectiveness of policies on VMT will help to prioritize local actions to reduce VMT to comply with AB 32 and SB 375. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN>A rough scenario analysis indicates that marginal infrastructure changes within neighborhood types will yield reductions in VMT and greenhouse gas emissions on the order of 5 percent. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN>Conclusions </SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN>This research has shown clearly that there is considerable heterogeneity in both Californians’ VMT and their estimated VMT response to changes in land use and transport system characteristics. These differences can be explained by categorizing neighborhoods. Looking forward, we suggest that studies of current policy “natural” experiments with before-after data collection be conducted, as these would provide a more direct link between on-the-ground actions and their VMT results. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN /></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Service Item Id: b816346b090b43bdab5f7dea2d8f1354
Copyright Text: Fehr and Peers, City of San Diego
Default Visibility: false
MaxRecordCount: 2000
Supported Query Formats: JSON, geoJSON, PBF
Min Scale: 0.0
Max Scale: 0.0
Supports Advanced Queries: true
Supports Statistics: true
Has Labels: false
Can Modify Layer: true
Can Scale Symbols: false
Use Standardized Queries: true
Supports Datum Transformation: true
Extent:
XMin: 6150763.738047466
YMin: 1775304.094061643
XMax: 6613437.0000350475
YMax: 2129759.999977812
Spatial Reference: 102646
(2230)
LatestVCSWkid(0)
Drawing Info:
Renderer:
Unique Value Renderer:
Field 1: type
Field 2: N/A
Field 3: N/A
Field Delimiter: ,
Default Symbol:
Default Label: N/A
UniqueValueInfos:
-
Value: 1
Label: Urban
Description: N/A
Symbol:
Style: esriSFSSolid
Color: [158, 170, 215, 255]
Outline:
Style: esriSLSSolid
Color: [255, 255, 255, 255]
Width: 1
-
Value: 2
Label: Suburban
Description: N/A
Symbol:
Style: esriSFSSolid
Color: [214, 157, 188, 255]
Outline:
Style: esriSLSSolid
Color: [255, 255, 255, 255]
Width: 1
-
Value: 3
Label: Rural
Description: N/A
Symbol:
Style: esriSFSSolid
Color: [245, 202, 122, 255]
Outline:
Style: esriSLSSolid
Color: [255, 255, 255, 255]
Width: 1
Transparency: 0
Labeling Info:
Advanced Query Capabilities:
Supports Statistics: true
Supports OrderBy: true
Supports Distinct: true
Supports Pagination: true
Supports TrueCurve: true
Supports Returning Query Extent: true
Supports Query With Distance: true
Supports Sql Expression: true
Supports Query With ResultType: false
Supports Returning Geometry Centroid: false
Supports Binning LOD: false
Supports Query With LOD Spatial Reference: false
HasZ: false
HasM: false
Has Attachments: false
HTML Popup Type: esriServerHTMLPopupTypeAsHTMLText
Type ID Field: null
Fields:
-
OBJECTID
(
type: esriFieldTypeOID, alias: OBJECTID
)
-
Shape
(
type: esriFieldTypeGeometry, alias: Shape
)
-
tract
(
type: esriFieldTypeDouble, alias: tract
)
-
neighborhood_type
(
type: esriFieldTypeString, alias: neighborhood_type, length: 254
)
-
Shape_Length
(
type: esriFieldTypeDouble, alias: Shape_Length
)
-
Shape_Area
(
type: esriFieldTypeDouble, alias: Shape_Area
)
Supported Operations:
Query
Query Attachments
Query Analytic
Generate Renderer
Return Updates
Iteminfo
Thumbnail
Metadata